Insurance

“Trouble Began Soon After” — A Weekend Case Study for Those Involved with Property Insurance Adjustments

The federal judge’s remark in a denied summary judgment opinion from a fire loss currently in litigation caught my attention.1 I often wonder about the reasons why some cases resolve without litigation or appraisal, and some do not. Accordingly, I propose that readers of this post read the full opinion and think—

  • What should the policyholder have done differently?
  • What should the insurance adjuster for AmGuard have done differently?
  • What do you think about the handling of the proof of loss?
  • Should the insurer have paid the amount of the undisputed amount of property damage?
  • What could have been done to avoid the litigation?
  • What do you think about the tone of the communications between the parties?

Please take some time to reflect on these questions while reading the opinion.

,

Related posts

The Rigsby Sisters Whistleblower Case In opposition to State Farm Involves an Finish After 16 Years

sesiv

The Reasonably Comparable Shingle Debate

sesiv

Sewage and Backups From Sewers—At all times Verify For the Altering Case Regulation

sesiv